↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin–0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin–0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/opth.s110739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamran Hosseini, Richard L Lindstrom, Gary Foulks, Kelly K Nichols

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 29%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#404
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,055
of 381,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.