↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Vaccine delivery system for tuberculosis based on nano-sized hepatitis B virus core protein particles

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Vaccine delivery system for tuberculosis based on nano-sized hepatitis B virus core protein particles
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s40238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dhananjayan Dhanasooraj, R Ajay Kumar, Sathish Mundayoor

Abstract

Nano-sized hepatitis B virus core virus-like particles (HBc-VLP) are suitable for uptake by antigen-presenting cells. Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen culture filtrate protein 10 (CFP-10) is an important vaccine candidate against tuberculosis. The purified antigen shows low immune response without adjuvant and tends to have low protective efficacy. The present study is based on the assumption that expression of these proteins on HBc nanoparticles would provide higher protection when compared to the native antigen alone. The cfp-10 gene was expressed as a fusion on the major immunodominant region of HBc-VLP, and the immune response in Balb/c mice was studied and compared to pure proteins, a mixture of antigens, and fusion protein-VLP, all without using any adjuvant. The humoral, cytokine, and splenocyte cell proliferation responses suggested that the HBc-VLP bearing CFP-10 generated an antigen-specific immune response in a Th1-dependent manner. By virtue of its self-adjuvant nature and ability to form nano-sized particles, HBc-VLPs are an excellent vaccine delivery system for use with subunit protein antigens identified in the course of recent vaccine research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,461
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,030
of 292,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#45
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.