↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Psychosocial assessments for young people: a systematic review examining acceptability, disclosure and engagement, and predictive utility

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychosocial assessments for young people: a systematic review examining acceptability, disclosure and engagement, and predictive utility
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s38442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Bradford, Debra Rickwood

Abstract

Adolescence and young adulthood are often turbulent periods in a person's life. There are high rates of accidental deaths, suicide, mental health concerns, substance use, and sexual experimentation. Health care professionals need to conduct holistic assessments of clients in these developmental life stages to identify psychosocial risks and provide targeted early intervention and implement prevention strategies. The most useful psychosocial assessments for most health care professionals are those that can provide a complete picture of the young person's life and circumstances. This article identifies psychosocial assessment instruments that can be used as an initial assessment and engagement tool with the general population of young people presenting for health care. We review the psychometric properties of each of the instruments, determining what type of instrument is most acceptable to young people, whether any can increase disclosure and improve engagement between young people and health professionals, and whether they have predictive utility. The search strategy complied with the relevant sections of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 89 published articles were identified, covering 31 different assessment instruments. Results indicated that those that were self-administered were most acceptable to young people, although it is unclear whether pen-and-paper or computer formats were preferred. Most psychosocial assessments can improve rates of disclosure and enhance engagement between young people and health professionals; however, worryingly, we found evidence that clinicians did not always respond to some of the most serious identified risks. Only for one instrument was there any mention of predictive utility. Future research should employ longitudinal approaches to determine the predictive utility of psychosocial assessments and focus on whether the use of new technologies can improve rates of disclosure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 23%
Psychology 25 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,296,727
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#74
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,741
of 286,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.