The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Designing a Dual GLP-1R/GIPR Agonist from Tirzepatide: Comparing Residues Between Tirzepatide, GLP-1, and GIP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s358989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijing Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,494,607
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#601
of 2,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,464
of 450,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.