The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
A Review on Human Orf: A Neglected Viral Zoonosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research and reports in tropical medicine, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/rrtm.s306446 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tesfaye Kassa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 26 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Research and reports in tropical medicine
#45
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,557
of 453,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and reports in tropical medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.