↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Conventional and Digital Workflow Planning for Maxillary Teeth Restoration with Porcelain Laminate Veneers: A Clinical Report

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Conventional and Digital Workflow Planning for Maxillary Teeth Restoration with Porcelain Laminate Veneers: A Clinical Report
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, February 2022
DOI 10.2147/ccide.s346743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shatha Alshali, Rayan Asali

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Unknown 13 72%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Unknown 13 72%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,932,863
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,304
of 521,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them