| Title |
Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of compliance with antidepressants for depressive disorders: systematic review of observational studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s39382 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amado Rivero-Santana, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Jeanette Pérez-Ramos, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar, Carlos De las Cuevas |
| Abstract |
The literature shows that compliance with antidepressant treatment is unsatisfactory. Several personal and disease-related variables have been shown to be related to compliance behavior. The objective of this study was to review the literature about sociodemographic and clinical predictors of compliance in patients with depressive disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 32% |
| Psychology | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,400
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,453
of 206,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.