| Title |
Comparative effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy versus control injections and exercise in the management of osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s118669 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chen-Yu Hung, Ming-Yen Hsiao, Ke-Vin Chang, Der-Sheng Han, Tyng-Guey Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Singapore | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,256,658
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#266
of 1,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,579
of 324,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#9
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.