↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2022
DOI 10.2147/opth.s362342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuen Yen Hong, Matt Boyd, Graham Wilson, Sheng Chiong Hong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 21 54%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 21 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,209
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,487
of 446,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.