Title |
The Subjective and Objective Improvement of Non-Invasive Treatment of Schumann Resonance in Insomnia—A Randomized and Double-Blinded Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature and science of sleep, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.2147/nss.s346941 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yu-Shu Huang, I Tang, Wei-Chih Chin, Ling-Sheng Jang, Chin-Pang Lee, Chen Lin, Chun-Pai Yang, Shu-Ling Cho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,269,730
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#189
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,516
of 448,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.