↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cranial nerves XIII and XIV: nerves in the shadows

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 468)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1162 tweeters
facebook
54 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Cranial nerves XIII and XIV: nerves in the shadows
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2013
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s39132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Bordoni, Zanier

Abstract

It has been known for over a century that these cranial nerves exist, and that they are not typographical errors nor a sensational event reported in the medical literature. A number of scientific articles on anatomy highlight how textbooks on descriptive anatomy do not always consider variables such as differences related to the geographical areas where people live, and these differences do exist. This is an important concept not only for surgeons, but also for all medical professionals who use manual techniques when treating their patients, ie, osteopaths, chiropractors, physiotherapists, and other manual therapists. This paper highlights the latest developments regarding these cranial nerves, offering at the same time some ideas for further reflection when looking at clinical scenarios that appear to bear little relationship to each other. Inclusion of these concepts in everyday anamnesis is encouraged.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,162 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 888. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#9,449
of 17,067,437 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47
of 158,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,067,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.