| Title |
Cranial nerves XIII and XIV: nerves in the shadows
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s39132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Bordoni, Emiliano Zanier |
| Abstract |
It has been known for over a century that these cranial nerves exist, and that they are not typographical errors nor a sensational event reported in the medical literature. A number of scientific articles on anatomy highlight how textbooks on descriptive anatomy do not always consider variables such as differences related to the geographical areas where people live, and these differences do exist. This is an important concept not only for surgeons, but also for all medical professionals who use manual techniques when treating their patients, ie, osteopaths, chiropractors, physiotherapists, and other manual therapists. This paper highlights the latest developments regarding these cranial nerves, offering at the same time some ideas for further reflection when looking at clinical scenarios that appear to bear little relationship to each other. Inclusion of these concepts in everyday anamnesis is encouraged. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 731 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 125 | 17% |
| United States | 24 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 42 | 6% |
| Unknown | 506 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 679 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 6% |
| Scientists | 9 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 637. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#35,267
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160
of 207,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.