↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The accumulation of macrophages attenuates the effect of recombinant human endostatin on lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
The accumulation of macrophages attenuates the effect of recombinant human endostatin on lung cancer
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s114389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanyang Liu, Li Tu, Li Wang, Jianlin Long, Jiantao Wang, Yuyi Wang, Feng Luo, Dan Cao

Abstract

Although anti-angiogenic therapy is widely applied clinically, its efficacy has been less than expected. Screening for regulatory factors and sensitive indicators to define the effectiveness of these drugs is required. Through a retrospective study of clinical data, we found that patients with a higher peripheral monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) obtained less benefit from recombinant human endostatin (rhES, Endostar(®)), an anti-angiogenic drug, in lung cancer. Because MLR is positively correlated with macrophage count in tumors, this result suggests that macrophages may influence the effectiveness of rhES therapy in lung cancer. Clinical data from 72 lung cancer patients treated with rhES were collected. Animal study, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western blot analysis, and transwell migration assays were carried on Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells, bone marrow-derived macrophages, macrophage cell line RAW264.7, and ANA-1 cells. Clinical data showed that compared with the baseline MLR before rhES treatment, patients with progressive disease had higher MLRs than those of patients with partial response. Experimental results showed that more macrophages were recruited in the LLC tumors after rhES treatment and the majority of them displayed an M2-like phenotype. rhES aggravated hypoxia and the inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment. Hypoxia promoted the expression of CCL2 by endothelial and fibroblast cells, which could induce macrophages recruitment, and increased levels of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-4 [IL-4], IL-6, and IL-10) skewed macrophage polarization toward the M2-like phenotype. Hypoxia or inflammation cytokine-treated macrophages enhanced the progression of LLC in vitro and in vivo. We found rhES could aggravate hypoxia and the inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment. These changes were favorable for macrophage accumulation, and skewed their polarization toward the M2-like phenotype which could help LLC to escape from the anti-angiogenic therapy. Thus, these data indicate the accumulation of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment may adversely affect the efficacy of rhES on lung cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,597
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,455
of 332,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#52
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.