| Title |
Animal models of frailty: current applications in clinical research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s105714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice E Kane, Sarah N Hilmer, John Mach, Sarah J Mitchell, Rafael de Cabo, Susan E Howlett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,397,056
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#256
of 1,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,164
of 333,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.