↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Childhood maltreatment as a risk factor for COPD: findings from a population-based survey of Canadian adults

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Childhood maltreatment as a risk factor for COPD: findings from a population-based survey of Canadian adults
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s107549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margot E Shields, Wendy E Hovdestad, Charles P Gilbert, Lil E Tonmyr

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the associations between childhood maltreatment (CM) and COPD in adulthood. Data were from 15,902 respondents to the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey - Mental Health. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine associations between CM and COPD and the role of smoking and mental and substance use variables as mediators in associations. COPD in adulthood was related to CM, with associations differing by sex. Among females, COPD was related to childhood physical abuse (CPA), childhood sexual abuse, and childhood exposure to intimate partner violence, but in the fully adjusted models, the association with CPA did not persist. Among males, COPD was related to childhood exposure to intimate partner violence and severe and frequent CPA, but these associations did not persist in the fully adjusted models. Results from this study establish CM as a risk factor for COPD in adulthood. A large part of the association is attributable to cigarette smoking, particularly for males. These findings underscore the importance of interventions to prevent CM as well as programs to assist victims of CM in dealing with tobacco addiction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 18%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Unspecified 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 39 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Unspecified 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 47 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,724
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,264
of 333,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#73
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.