↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Association of prostate volume with incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Urology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Association of prostate volume with incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer
Published in
Research and Reports in Urology, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/rru.s117963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shadi Al-Khalil, Christine Ibilibor, James Thomas Cammack, Werner de Riese

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible correlation between prostate volume and aggressiveness and incidence of prostate cancer (PCa). A chart review of a cohort of 448 consecutive prostate biopsy-naive men was performed. These men underwent at least a 12-core biopsy at our institution due to increased prostate-specific antigen serum levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or suspicious findings on digital rectal examination during the period between 2008 and 2013. Transrectal ultrasound was used to determine the prostate volume. The positive biopsy rate was 66% for patients with a prostate volume of ≤35 cc and 40% for patients with a prostate volume of ≥65 cc (P<0.001). Of the 110 patients testing positive on biopsy with a volume of ≤35 cc, 10 patients (9.1%) had a Gleason score of ≥8. Of the 27 patients testing positive on biopsy with a volume of ≥65 cc, only 1 patient (3.7%) had a Gleason score of ≥8. These results suggest that there may be an association between prostate volume and the incidence and aggressiveness of PCa. The larger the prostate, the lower the positive biopsy rate for PCa and the lower the Gleason score.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 22%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%