↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Predictive Value of the (Quick)DASH Tool for Upper Extremity Dysfunction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Patient related outcome measures, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Predictive Value of the (Quick)DASH Tool for Upper Extremity Dysfunction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Published in
Patient related outcome measures, June 2022
DOI 10.2147/prom.s353895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Zwaan, Elena Cheung, Alexander IJsselmuiden, Carlo Holtzer, Ton Schreuders, Marcel Kofflard, Marco Alings, J Henk Coert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,754,982
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#88
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,174
of 446,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.