↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Imaging techniques for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Reports in Medical Imaging, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Imaging techniques for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Published in
Reports in Medical Imaging, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/rmi.s11623
Authors

Fikret Er, Aghajanzadeh, Natig Gassanov, Matthias Schmidt, Nasser Semmo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 79%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,185,720
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Reports in Medical Imaging
#40
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,905
of 180,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reports in Medical Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them