↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

What should be the patient's preference regarding the choice of hospital in the case of radical cystectomy? Evaluation of early complications after open radical cystectomy in a medium and high volume…

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
What should be the patient's preference regarding the choice of hospital in the case of radical cystectomy? Evaluation of early complications after open radical cystectomy in a medium and high volume setting in one hospital
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s103217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Mani, Stefan Vallo, Maximilian P Brandt, Kilian M Gust, Claudia Bartsch, Johannes Daechert, Igor Tsaur, Georg Bartsch, Axel Haferkamp

Abstract

This study compares early complications after cystectomy and urinary diversion (UD) stratified by the surgical focus and case load of two different department chairpersons in a single institution in two time periods. Creating clear data about complications that can affect the quality of life is an important tool for patients to decide whether and where to perform this extensive surgery. A team of surgeons with a clear focus on pelvic surgery leads to lower complication rates in radical cystectomy. Radical cystectomy was performed in two separate time periods under the patronage of two different chairmen in the same university hospital. The patient data were analyzed retrospectively and the complications 30 days after surgery were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the severity of complications between the two time periods, A and B, in total (P<0.001). When placing patients into subgroups, significantly more complications in period A were also seen concerning sex (male, P<0.001; female, P=0.003), age (<70 years, P<0.001; >70 years, P≤50.001) tumor grade (low grade, P<0.001; high grade, P≤0.001), and UD (ileal conduit, P<0.001; neobladder, P<0.001). In a multivariable analysis, age (P=0.031) and type of UD (P=0.028) were determined as independent predictors for complications in period A. When joining the two periods together, the type of UD (P=0.0417), age (P=0.041), and the time periods (A/B) (P<0.001) show a significant association with the presence of complications. This study compares for the first time surgical complications in two time periods with different case load and surgical focus in one department. Categorization shows that patients should prefer radical cystectomy in centers of excellence or a high-volume hospital in order to keep complications at the lowest possible level and thus have the highest benefit for oncologic outcome and quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Unspecified 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Unspecified 2 10%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,478,448
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,300
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,268
of 324,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#60
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.