↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ligand-based targeted therapy: a novel strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Ligand-based targeted therapy: a novel strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s115727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Li, Weiyue Zhang, Birong Wang, Yang Gao, Zifang Song, Qi Chang Zheng

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Chemotherapy is recommended to patients with intermediate or advanced stage cancer. However, the conventional chemotherapy yields low desired response rates due to multidrug resistance, fast clearance rate, nonspecific delivery, severe side effects, low drug concentration in cancer cells, and so on. Nanoparticle-mediated targeted drug delivery system can surmount the aforementioned obstacles through enhanced permeability and retention effect and active targeting as a novel approach of therapeutics for HCC in recent years. The active targeting is triggered by ligands on the delivery system, which recognize with and internalize into hepatoma cells with high specificity and efficiency. This review focuses on the latest targeted delivery systems for HCC and summarizes the ligands that can enhance the capacity of active targeting, to provide some insight into future research in nanomedicine for HCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Lecturer 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 17%
Chemistry 16 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 40 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,496,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#655
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,028
of 332,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#16
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.