↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Beliefs and perception about mental health issues: a meta-synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 3,120)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
528 Mendeley
Title
Beliefs and perception about mental health issues: a meta-synthesis
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s111543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahad Riaz Choudhry, Vasudevan Mani, Long Chiau Ming, Tahir Mehmood Khan

Abstract

Mental health literacy is the beliefs and knowledge about mental health issues and their remedies. Attitudes and beliefs of lay individuals about mental illness are shaped by personal knowledge about mental illness, knowing and interacting with someone living with mental illness, and cultural stereotypes. Mental health issues are increasing and are alarming in almost every part of the world, and hence compiling this review provides an opportunity to understand the different views regarding mental disorders and problems as well as to fill the gap in the published literature by focusing only on the belief system and perception of mental health problems among general population. The methodology involved a systematic review and the meta-synthesis method, which includes synthesizing published qualitative studies on mental health perception and beliefs. Fifteen relevant published qualitative and mixed-method studies, regarding the concept of mental health, were identified for meta-synthesis. All the themes of the selected studies were further analyzed to give a broader picture of mental health problems and their perceived causes and management. Only qualitative studies, not older than 2010, focusing on beliefs about, attitudes toward, and perceptions of mental health problems, causes, and treatments were included in this review. The findings are divided into four major categories, namely, 1) symptoms of mental health issues, 2) description of mental health issues, 3) perceived causes, and 4) preferred treatment and help-seeking behavior. Each category contains themes and subthemes based on published studies. The findings reveal multiple causes of, descriptions of, and treatment options for mental health problems, thereby providing insight into different help-seeking behaviors. Clarity is offered by highlighting cultural differences and similarities in mental health beliefs and perceptions about the causes of mental health problems. The implications of the studies and recommendations based on current findings are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 528 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 17%
Student > Bachelor 78 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 8%
Researcher 26 5%
Lecturer 22 4%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 194 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 8%
Social Sciences 34 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Other 85 16%
Unknown 202 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#167,934
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#23
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,297
of 333,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.