↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bestform-F – Best Function of Range of Motion: A Feasibility Study of a Multimodal Exercise Training Program for Older Adults in Retirement Homes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Bestform-F – Best Function of Range of Motion: A Feasibility Study of a Multimodal Exercise Training Program for Older Adults in Retirement Homes
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2022
DOI 10.2147/cia.s367858
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Schaller, Helge Krusemark, Esther Mende, Michael Weiß, Bianca Spanier, Otto Zelger, Jan Bischof, Bernhard Haller, Martin Halle, Monika Siegrist

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 26 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 29 74%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,550
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,244
of 439,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.