The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Predictive modeling of nanomaterial exposure effects in biological systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s40742 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiong Liu, Kaizhi Tang, Stacey Harper, Bryan Harper, Jeffery A Steevens, Roger Xu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 26% |
| Researcher | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,896,985
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,124
of 4,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,431
of 214,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#37
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.