| Title |
Relationship Between the Use of Preprinted Physician Orders for Hospital-Acquired Fever and Time to Blood Culture Collection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s361882 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taku Harada, Shintaro Kosaka, Juichi Hiroshige, Takashi Watari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,383,183
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#363
of 1,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,900
of 442,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#8
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.