| Title |
A Comprehensive Review of Non-Energy-Based Treatments for Atrophic Acne Scarring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s350040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Curtis Tam, Jeffrey Khong, Kevin Tam, Ruslan Vasilev, Wesley Wu, Salar Hazany |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,840,893
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#282
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,855
of 449,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.