↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lung Perfusion Assessment in Pulmonary Embolism: Novel Semi-Automatic Lung Perfusion Software in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Compared to Traditional Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy

Overview of attention for article published in Reports in Medical Imaging, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
Title
Lung Perfusion Assessment in Pulmonary Embolism: Novel Semi-Automatic Lung Perfusion Software in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Compared to Traditional Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy
Published in
Reports in Medical Imaging, August 2022
DOI 10.2147/rmi.s355965
Authors

Giulia Lastella, Andrea Esposito, Alice Scarabelli, Guido Giovanni Plensich, Elvira Stellato, Emanuele Avola, Caterina Giannitto, Massimo Castellani, Marco Cuzzocrea, Luca Bonomo, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,488,947
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Reports in Medical Imaging
#24
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,925
of 431,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reports in Medical Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them