| Title |
Optimal management of thumb basal joint arthritis: challenges and solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orthopedic research and reviews, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/orr.s138809 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Higgenbotham, Alan Boyd, Michelle Busch, Dennis Heaton, Thomas Trumble |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Orthopedic research and reviews
#15
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,562
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopedic research and reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them