| Title |
Improved subjective symptoms of conjunctivochalasis using bipolar diathermy method for conjunctival shrinkage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s24475 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoyuki Kashima, Hideo Akiyama, Fumihide Miura, Shoji Kishi |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the improvement in subjective symptoms of conjunctivochalasis after bipolar coagulation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 29% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 64% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2011.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,207
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,259
of 136,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.