| Title |
Metabolic pathway and distribution of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: in vivo study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s23638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva K Schlachter, Hans Ruedi Widmer, Amadé Bregy, Tarja Lönnfors-Weitzel, Istvan Vajtai, Nadia Corazza, Vianney JP Bernau, Thilo Weitzel, Pasquale Mordasini, Johannes Slotboom, Gudrun Herrmann, Serge Bogni, Heinrich Hofmann, Martin Frenz, Michael Reinert |
| Abstract |
Experimental tissue fusion benefits from the selective heating of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) under high frequency irradiation. However, the metabolic pathways of SPIONs for tissue fusion remain unknown. Hence, the goal of this in vivo study was to analyze the distribution of SPIONs in different organs by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological analysis after a SPION-containing patch implantation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 27% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,598
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,262
of 130,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#38
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.