↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The MS Choices Survey: findings of a study assessing physician and patient perspectives on living with and managing multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The MS Choices Survey: findings of a study assessing physician and patient perspectives on living with and managing multiple sclerosis
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, December 2011
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s26479
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Riñon, Mandy Buch, Derek Holley, Elisabetta Verdun

Abstract

Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) can reduce relapse frequency and delay disability progression. Although adherence to DMDs is difficult to measure accurately, evidence suggests that poor adherence is common and can compromise treatment success. There are likely to be multiple factors underlying poor adherence. To better understand these factors, the global MS Choices Survey investigated patient and physician perspectives regarding key aspects of MS diagnosis, treatment adherence and persistence, and disease management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 36%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#632
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,659
of 252,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.