| Title |
Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s28101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaomian Wu, Xiaochen Liu, Jie Wei, Jian Ma, Feng Deng, Shicheng Wei |
| Abstract |
Compared with titanium (Ti) and other metal implant materials, poly(ether-ether ketone) (PEEK) shows outstanding biomechanical properties. A number of studies have also reported attractive bioactivity for nano-TiO(2) (n-TiO(2)). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 60 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 29% |
| Engineering | 30 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 19 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 71 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,598
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,817
of 168,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#89
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.