↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lung toxicities of core–shell nanoparticles composed of carbon, cobalt, and silica

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Lung toxicities of core–shell nanoparticles composed of carbon, cobalt, and silica
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s39649
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed T Al Samri, Rafael Silva, Saeeda Almarzooqi, Alia Albawardi, Aws Rashad Diab Othman, Ruqayya SMS Al Hanjeri, Shaikha KM Al Dawaar, Saeed Tariq, Abdul-Kader Souid, Tewodros Asefa

Abstract

We present here comparative assessments of murine lung toxicity (biocompatibility) after in vitro and in vivo exposures to carbon (C-SiO2-etched), carbon-silica (C-SiO2), carbon-cobalt-silica (C-Co-SiO2), and carbon-cobalt oxide-silica (C-Co3O4-SiO2) nanoparticles. These nanoparticles have potential applications in clinical medicine and bioimaging, and thus their possible adverse events require thorough investigation. The primary aim of this work was to explore whether the nanoparticles are biocompatible with pneumatocyte bioenergetics (cellular respiration and adenosine triphosphate content). Other objectives included assessments of caspase activity, lung structure, and cellular organelles. Pneumatocyte bioenergetics of murine lung remained preserved after treatment with C-SiO2-etched or C-SiO2 nanoparticles. C-SiO2-etched nanoparticles, however, increased caspase activity and altered lung structure more than C-SiO2 did. Consistent with the known mitochondrial toxicity of cobalt, both C-Co-SiO2 and C-Co3O4-SiO2 impaired lung tissue bioenergetics. C-Co-SiO2, however, increased caspase activity and altered lung structure more than C-Co3O4-SiO2. The results indicate that silica shell is essential for biocompatibility. Furthermore, cobalt oxide is the preferred phase over the zerovalent Co(0) phase to impart biocompatibility to cobalt-based nanoparticles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Chemistry 6 25%
Materials Science 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,594
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,749
of 206,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#33
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.