↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Understanding the physical, social, and emotional experiences of people with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the physical, social, and emotional experiences of people with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s116173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Berenguera, Àngels Molló-Inesta, Manel Mata-Cases, Josep Franch-Nadal, Bonaventura Bolíbar, Esther Rubinat, Dídac Mauricio

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of self-management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to determine the factors to consider when developing and implementing a person-centered intervention in patients with poor glycemic control attending primary care. This was a qualitative study conducted in 6 primary care health centers in Catalonia. Patients who had been diagnosed with T2DM and had glycated hemoglobin of 9% or more were included. The sampling method was opportunistic, accounting for gender, age, duration of diabetes, and type of treatment. Forty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thematic content analysis was performed. The patients perceived the diagnosis of T2DM as a threat to their health, and the diagnosis generated cognitive and emotional representations of T2DM. The emotions associated with the diagnosis included fear of the future, worry, denial, sadness, and dejection. The patients also wondered if there could have been an error in their test results because they did not present any symptoms. These representations, both cognitive and emotional, can produce specific effects in adaptation processes and require different approach strategies, specifically regarding diet, physical activity, and pharmacological treatment. Finally, specific aspects regarding the acceptability and adaptability of the implementation of a new intervention were expressed. Patients with T2DM and very poor glycemic control expressed difficulty achieving a balance between the needs and demands of managing and controlling T2DM because they felt it strongly interfered in their daily lives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 20%
Psychology 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,685,860
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#113
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,238
of 320,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.