↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Living with a sibling who suffers from an eating disorder: a pilot interview study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Living with a sibling who suffers from an eating disorder: a pilot interview study
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s115934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carina Callio, Sanna Aila Gustafsson

Abstract

Having a sibling who suffers from an eating disorder (ED) has a profound effect on healthy siblings' own health, quality of life and family relationships, yet siblings have been an excluded group within health care, and there is a lack of knowledge regarding healthy siblings' needs and wishes for information and support. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine adolescents' experiences of living with a sibling who suffers from an ED. In this small-scale pilot study, three boys and two girls aged 15-20 years were interviewed, and the interviews were analyzed by qualitative content analysis. This study confirms prior knowledge of adolescents' experiences of living with a sibling who is suffering from an ED. The adolescents were concerned about their siblings and lacked information about their siblings' illness and treatment progress. The girls described that their everyday life had been heavily influenced by their sisters' illness, while the boys described that their everyday life with friends and activities were not affected to such a great extent. One new result that emerged as something positive was that some informants described that although the ED was a source of conflict in the family, it had led to greater awareness of the importance of gaining sufficient energy and had contributed to better meal situations in the family. Having a sibling with an ED had a profound and negative effect on family relationships, and was often a source of conflict, especially around mealtime. However, it appeared that if parents were able to organize family meals and create an open and supportive climate, the negative effects for the family could be reduced. The health care professionals need to acknowledge the siblings' need for information and support, and support parents in their important role of caring for well siblings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 24 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,618,268
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#356
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,076
of 318,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.