↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Risk factors and mortality associated with undertriage at a level I safety-net trauma center: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors and mortality associated with undertriage at a level I safety-net trauma center: a retrospective study
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s117397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Barsi, Peter Harris, Rich Menaik, Nicholas C Reis, Swapna Munnangi, Mikhail Elfond

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with undertriage and the risk factors for mortality among the undertriaged patients at a level I safety-net trauma center. A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma patients who presented to a level I safety-net trauma center with an injury severity score >15 over a 2-year period (2013-2014). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors predictive of undertriage in major trauma patients (injury severity score >15) and of mortality in undertriaged patients. During the 2-year study period, 334 of 2,485 admitted trauma patients presented with major trauma and were included in our study. From the univariate analysis, variables that were found to be independently associated with mortality in undertriaged patients included intubation, Glasgow Coma Scale score, revised trauma score, and dementia. Independent risk factors that were found to be significantly associated with undertriage in severely injured trauma patients included Glasgow Coma Scale score, motor vehicle crash, falls, revised trauma score, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, intubation, and dementia. When a multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the statistically significant risk factors, dementia was found to be significantly associated with undertriage in severely injured trauma patients. Severely injured trauma patients with dementia are at significant risk for undertriage. Early identification of these risk factors while triaging at a level I safety-net trauma center could translate into improved patient outcomes following severe trauma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,043,267
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#112
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,668
of 318,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.