↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Parental practice of child car safety in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Parental practice of child car safety in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria
Published in
Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/phmt.s115842
Pubmed ID
Authors

KI Ndu, U Ekwochi, DC Osuorah, OC Ifediora, FO Amadi, IN Asinobi, OW Okenwa, JC Orjioke, FN Ogbuka, TO Ulasi

Abstract

Child safety restraints and seat belts are regarded as the most successful safety and cost-effective protective devices available to vehicle occupants, which have saved millions of lives. This cross-sectional descriptive study evaluated the practice and use of child car restraints (CCRs) among 458 purposively selected respondents resident in two local government areas in Enugu State, Nigeria. Self-administered questionnaires were sent to parents of children attending private schools who owned a car. Chi-square and multivariate analyses were used to assess the determinants of the use of car restraints in children among respondents. In all, 56% and 45% of adults and children, respectively, used car restraints regularly. The awareness of child safety laws and actual use of age-appropriate CCRs among respondents was negatively and weakly correlated (r=-0.121, P=0.310). Only respondent's use of seat belt during driving (P=0.001) and having being cautioned for non-use of CCRs (P=0.005) maintained significance as determinants of the use of CCRs in cars on multivariate analysis. The most frequent reasons given for the non-use of CCRs included the child being uncomfortable, 64 (31%); restraints not being important, 53 (26%), and restraints being too expensive, 32 (15%). Similarly, for irregular users, exceptions for non-use included the child being asleep (29%), inadequate number of CCRs (22%), and the child being sick (18%). There is a need for a strategy change to enforce the use of CCRs in Nigeria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#77
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,210
of 317,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them