↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Docetaxel for non small cell lung cancer harboring the activated EGFR mutation with T790M at initial presentation

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Docetaxel for non small cell lung cancer harboring the activated EGFR mutation with T790M at initial presentation
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, March 2013
DOI 10.2147/ott.s41797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiromichi Yamane, Nobuaki Ochi, Masayuki Yasugi, Takayuki Tabayashi, Tomoko Yamagishi, Yasumasa Monobe, Akiko Hisamoto, Katsuyuki Kiura, Nagio Takigawa

Abstract

A 72-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with Stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chest computed tomography revealed a mass in the upper lobe of the right lung, with pleural effusion. Cytologic examination identified adenocarcinoma cells in the right pleural effusion. Furthermore, both a deletion mutation in exon 19 and a threonine-methionine substitution mutation at position 790 in exon 20 (T790M) were detected in the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) in the malignant cells. As systemic chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin and pemetrexed or erlotinib proved ineffective, docetaxel monotherapy was initiated as a third-line treatment. Following salvage chemotherapy, her Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status improved from 3 to 1, with tumor regression over 5 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of successful docetaxel treatment for a patient with NSCLC harboring the T790M EGFR-activating mutation identified before treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 41%
Professor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,573
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,453
of 206,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.