↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Urology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
Published in
Research and Reports in Urology, August 2022
DOI 10.2147/rru.s372208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang G Qu, Garson Chan, Johan Gani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,549,893
of 24,350,163 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#148
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,988
of 420,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,350,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.