Title |
Assessing the nutritional status of elderly Chinese lung cancer patients using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) tool
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s41941 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lei Zhang, Yanjun Su, Chen Wang, Yongsheng Sha, Hong Zhu, Shumin Xie, Sabrina Kwauk, Jing Zhang, Yunshou Lin, Changli Wang |
Abstract |
This study assessed the nutritional status of elderly Chinese lung cancer inpatients using a revised version of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA(®)) tool. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,535
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,453
of 206,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.