The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Current and emerging treatments for the management of myasthenia gravis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s14015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sivakumar Sathasivam |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#23,482,472
of 26,158,673 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,210
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,509
of 129,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,158,673 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.