↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Helminth infection during pregnancy: insights from evolutionary ecology

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Helminth infection during pregnancy: insights from evolutionary ecology
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s103529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron D Blackwell

Abstract

Helminths are parasitic nematodes and trematodes, grouped together because of morphological similarities and commonalities in the effects infections have on hosts. These include complications such as anemia and biasing of immune responses, which can alter susceptibility for other diseases. For pregnant women, these complications might have implications for pregnancy outcomes or neonatal health. Here, I review studies of helminth infections during pregnancy, and ask the following questions: Do helminths affect maternal health or pregnancy outcomes? Are there consequences of maternal infection for infants? What are the effects of antihelminth treatment during pregnancy? The evidence suggests that the answers to these questions depend on the particular helminth species in question, maternal nutritional status, and the presence or absence of comorbid infection with other species, such as malaria. Moreover, there may also be unexpected consequences of treatment, as maternal infections can affect the priming of infant immune systems, with potential effects on infants later in life. These complex interactions suggest that a consideration of the evolutionary history of human-helminth interactions, as well as the ecological context of infections, can help to clarify an understanding of these host-parasite interactions and provide direction for future investigations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 46 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,053,336
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#108
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,319
of 313,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.