↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with the Heidelberg Spectralis® noncontact ultra-widefield module versus the Optos® Optomap®

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with the Heidelberg Spectralis® noncontact ultra-widefield module versus the Optos® Optomap®
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s41731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew T Witmer, George Parlitsis, Sarju Patel, Szilárd Kiss

Abstract

To compare ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography imaging using the Optos(®) Optomap(®) and the Heidelberg Spectralis(®) noncontact ultra-widefield module.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Other 10 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 51%
Engineering 10 12%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,207
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,376
of 291,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#47
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.