↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Progress in the Clinical Assessment and Treatment of Myocardial Depression in Critically Ill Patient with Sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inflammation Research, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Progress in the Clinical Assessment and Treatment of Myocardial Depression in Critically Ill Patient with Sepsis
Published in
Journal of Inflammation Research, September 2022
DOI 10.2147/jir.s379905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu-Dong Shen, Hua-Sheng Zhang, Rui Zhang, Jun Li, Zhi-Gang Zhou, Zhi-Xian Jin, Yin-Jia Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,865,133
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#519
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,887
of 433,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#42
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.