The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Management of Progressive Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Carcinoma: Current Perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s340967 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alice Nervo, Francesca Retta, Alberto Ragni, Alessandro Piovesan, Marco Gallo, Emanuela Arvat |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,727,332
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#353
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,090
of 440,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.