↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Scaling-up voluntary medical male circumcision – what have we learned?

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Scaling-up voluntary medical male circumcision – what have we learned?
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), October 2014
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s65354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny H Ledikwe, Robert O Nyanga, Jaclyn Hagon, Jessica S Grignon, Mulamuli Mpofu, Bazghina-werq Semo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Social Sciences 14 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#88
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,387
of 265,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.