| Title |
Androgenetic Alopecia Among Hospital Staff: A Study of Prevalence, Types and a Comparison with General Population in a Secondary Hospital in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s333789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhanglei Mu, Yanjun Gao, Kun Li, Hualong Liu, Jianzhong Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,090,715
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#152
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,419
of 433,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.