| Title |
Loneliness and Pain Catastrophizing Among Individuals with Chronic Pain: The Mediating Role of Depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s377789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenna M Wilson, Carin A Colebaugh, Samantha M Meints, K Mikayla Flowers, Robert R Edwards, Kristin L Schreiber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,232,832
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#447
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,125
of 431,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#9
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.