Title |
Prevalence and factors associated with suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rates in COPD
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/copd.s195438 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sohini Ghosh, Roy A Pleasants, Jill A Ohar, James F Donohue, M Bradley Drummond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,089
of 2,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,016
of 371,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.