↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of Astigmatism Prediction Accuracy for Toric Lens Implantation from Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Comparison of Astigmatism Prediction Accuracy for Toric Lens Implantation from Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2022
DOI 10.2147/opth.s378019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert F Melendez, Gerard Smits, Thao Nguyen, Chaselyn D Ruffaner-Hanson, Danielle Ortiz, Brad Hall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,270,333
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#777
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,403
of 440,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#10
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.