↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Inter-sport variability of muscle volume distribution identified by segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis in four ball sports

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Inter-sport variability of muscle volume distribution identified by segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis in four ball sports
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s43512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yosuke Yamada, Yoshihisa Masuo, Eitaro Nakamura, Shingo Oda

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify differences in muscle distribution in athletes of various ball sports using segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (SBIA). Participants were 115 male collegiate athletes from four ball sports (baseball, soccer, tennis, and lacrosse). Percent body fat (%BF) and lean body mass were measured, and SBIA was used to measure segmental muscle volume (MV) in bilateral upper arms, forearms, thighs, and lower legs. We calculated the MV ratios of dominant to nondominant, proximal to distal, and upper to lower limbs. The measurements consisted of a total of 31 variables. Cluster and factor analyses were applied to identify redundant variables. The muscle distribution was significantly different among groups, but the %BF was not. The classification procedures of the discriminant analysis could correctly distinguish 84.3% of the athletes. These results suggest that collegiate ball game athletes have adapted their physique to their sport movements very well, and the SBIA, which is an affordable, noninvasive, easy-to-operate, and fast alternative method in the field, can distinguish ball game athletes according to their specific muscle distribution within a 5-minute measurement. The SBIA could be a useful, affordable, and fast tool for identifying talents for specific sports.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
Spain 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,270,134
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#181
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,193
of 200,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.